[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <737b6f8a-78a2-71f1-cd31-6d1b5e4223d2@fb.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 09:43:28 +0900
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
To: Vlad Dumitrescu <vlad@...itrescu.ro>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<daniel@...earbox.net>, <brakmo@...com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <kraigatgoog@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bpf: add support for SO_PRIORITY in
bpf_getsockopt
On 11/10/17 8:04 AM, Vlad Dumitrescu wrote:
> From: Vlad Dumitrescu <vladum@...gle.com>
>
> Allows BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCK_OPS programs to read sk_priority.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vlad Dumitrescu <vladum@...gle.com>
> ---
> net/core/filter.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> index 1afa17935954..61c791f9f628 100644
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> @@ -3292,8 +3292,20 @@ BPF_CALL_5(bpf_getsockopt, struct bpf_sock_ops_kern *, bpf_sock,
> if (!sk_fullsock(sk))
> goto err_clear;
>
> + if (level == SOL_SOCKET) {
> + if (optlen != sizeof(int))
> + goto err_clear;
> +
> + switch (optname) {
> + case SO_PRIORITY:
> + *((int *)optval) = sk->sk_priority;
would be cleaner to add sk_priority to 'struct bpf_sock_ops' instead.
Faster runtime too.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists