[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171118.103507.1606377296636037986.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 10:35:07 +0900 (KST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: lucien.xin@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, hannes@...essinduktion.org,
pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] route: update fnhe_expires for redirect when the
fnhe exists
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 14:27:06 +0800
> Now when creating fnhe for redirect, it sets fnhe_expires for this
> new route cache. But when updating the exist one, it doesn't do it.
> It will cause this fnhe never to be expired.
>
> Paolo already noticed it before, in Jianlin's test case, it became
> even worse:
>
> When ip route flush cache, the old fnhe is not to be removed, but
> only clean it's members. When redirect comes again, this fnhe will
> be found and updated, but never be expired due to fnhe_expires not
> being set.
>
> So fix it by simply updating fnhe_expires even it's for redirect.
>
> Fixes: aee06da6726d ("ipv4: use seqlock for nh_exceptions")
> Reported-by: Jianlin Shi <jishi@...hat.com>
> Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Applied.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists