[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <91944888-b8be-7b4e-4a26-1d8c9738e5d6@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 15:10:08 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: wexu@...hat.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mst@...hat.com, mjrosato@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] tap: free skb if flags error
On 2017年12月01日 13:54, wexu@...hat.com wrote:
> From: Wei Xu <wexu@...hat.com>
>
> tap_recvmsg() supports accepting skb by msg_control after
> commit 3b4ba04acca8 ("tap: support receiving skb from msg_control"),
> the skb if presented should be freed within the function, otherwise
> it would be leaked.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Xu <wexu@...hat.com>
> Reported-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/tap.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tap.c b/drivers/net/tap.c
> index e9489b8..1c66b75 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tap.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tap.c
> @@ -1154,9 +1154,13 @@ static int tap_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m,
> size_t total_len, int flags)
> {
> struct tap_queue *q = container_of(sock, struct tap_queue, sock);
> + struct sk_buff *skb = m->msg_control;
> int ret;
> - if (flags & ~(MSG_DONTWAIT|MSG_TRUNC))
> + if (flags & ~(MSG_DONTWAIT|MSG_TRUNC)) {
> + if (skb)
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> return -EINVAL;
> + }
> ret = tap_do_read(q, &m->msg_iter, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT,
> m->msg_control);
Need to deal with iov_iterator_count() == 0.
Thanks
> if (ret > total_len) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists