[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171203.112200.2205442818284347522.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2017 11:22:00 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: cugyly@....com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Linyu.Yuan@...atel-sbell.com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] netlink: optimize err assignment
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2017 07:20:09 -0800
> On Sun, 2017-12-03 at 21:10 +0800, yuan linyu wrote:
>> From: yuan linyu <Linyu.Yuan@...atel-sbell.com.cn>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: yuan linyu <Linyu.Yuan@...atel-sbell.com.cn>
>> ---
>> v2: fix kbuild test warning
>> ---
>> net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>> ------------
>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>>
>
> I see no reason why we should accept this code churn.
>
> This kind of change makes future fix backports harder.
I agree, and I've been trying to discourage these "improvements"
as much as possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists