[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1512314409.19682.51.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2017 07:20:09 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: yuan linyu <cugyly@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
yuan linyu <Linyu.Yuan@...atel-sbell.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] netlink: optimize err assignment
On Sun, 2017-12-03 at 21:10 +0800, yuan linyu wrote:
> From: yuan linyu <Linyu.Yuan@...atel-sbell.com.cn>
>
> Signed-off-by: yuan linyu <Linyu.Yuan@...atel-sbell.com.cn>
> ---
> v2: fix kbuild test warning
> ---
> net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> ------------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
I see no reason why we should accept this code churn.
This kind of change makes future fix backports harder.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists