netdev - Re: Linux 4.14 - regression: broken tun/tap / bridge network with virtio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171208125835.xnjzidixymdqovmy@unicorn.suse.cz>
Date:   Fri, 8 Dec 2017 13:58:35 +0100
From:   Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
To:     Andreas Hartmann <andihartmann@...19freenet.de>
Cc:     Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 4.14 - regression: broken tun/tap / bridge network with
 virtio - bisected

On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 01:45:38PM +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> On 12/08/2017 at 12:40 PM Michal Kubecek wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 11:31:50AM +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> >>
> >> When will there be a fix for 4.14? It is clearly a regression. Is
> >> it possible / a good idea to just remove the complete patch series
> >> "Remove UDP Fragmentation Offload support"?
> > 
> > I cannot give an exact date but the patch is queued for stable (see
> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/bundle/davem/stable/?state=* ) so that
> > it should land in stable-4.14 in near future (weeks at most).
> 
> Which one is it? I couldn't find any patch related to this problem at
> first glance.

"[net,v2] net: accept UFO datagrams from tuntap and packet" - the
subject was mentioned in one of my earlier e-mails (with commit id).

Michal Kubecek