netdev - Re: Linux 4.14 - regression: broken tun/tap / bridge network with virtio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1705a3cc-4d9f-8fd0-3eed-9f6a145d5055@01019freenet.de>
Date:   Fri, 8 Dec 2017 14:13:38 +0100
From:   Andreas Hartmann <andihartmann@...19freenet.de>
To:     Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
Cc:     Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 4.14 - regression: broken tun/tap / bridge network with
 virtio - bisected

On 12/08/2017 at 01:58 PM Michal Kubecek wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 01:45:38PM +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
>> On 12/08/2017 at 12:40 PM Michal Kubecek wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 11:31:50AM +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
>>>>
>>>> When will there be a fix for 4.14? It is clearly a regression. Is
>>>> it possible / a good idea to just remove the complete patch series
>>>> "Remove UDP Fragmentation Offload support"?
>>>
>>> I cannot give an exact date but the patch is queued for stable (see
>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/bundle/davem/stable/?state=* ) so that
>>> it should land in stable-4.14 in near future (weeks at most).
>>
>> Which one is it? I couldn't find any patch related to this problem at
>> first glance.
> 
> "[net,v2] net: accept UFO datagrams from tuntap and packet" - the
> subject was mentioned in one of my earlier e-mails (with commit id).

Oh - I thought this would only work during live migration (which doesn't
happen here). My error.


Thanks,
regards,
Andreas