netdev - Re: Linux 4.14 - regression: broken tun/tap / bridge network with virtio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4039a442-88f8-9125-ae08-5dd0bc3ad865@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 8 Dec 2017 23:11:28 +0800
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:     Andreas Hartmann <andihartmann@...19freenet.de>,
        Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 4.14 - regression: broken tun/tap / bridge network with
 virtio - bisected



On 2017年12月08日 21:13, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> On 12/08/2017 at 01:58 PM Michal Kubecek wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 01:45:38PM +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
>>> On 12/08/2017 at 12:40 PM Michal Kubecek wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 11:31:50AM +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
>>>>> When will there be a fix for 4.14? It is clearly a regression. Is
>>>>> it possible / a good idea to just remove the complete patch series
>>>>> "Remove UDP Fragmentation Offload support"?
>>>> I cannot give an exact date but the patch is queued for stable (see
>>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/bundle/davem/stable/?state=* ) so that
>>>> it should land in stable-4.14 in near future (weeks at most).
>>> Which one is it? I couldn't find any patch related to this problem at
>>> first glance.
>> "[net,v2] net: accept UFO datagrams from tuntap and packet" - the
>> subject was mentioned in one of my earlier e-mails (with commit id).
> Oh - I thought this would only work during live migration (which doesn't
> happen here). My error.
>
>
> Thanks,
> regards,
> Andreas

I think you can either wait it to go for stable or test Linus tree which 
has already contained the patch.

Thanks