[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e3256db09d434461acb5861b30ef6f65@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 16:04:58 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Marcelo Ricardo Leitner' <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
CC: 'Xin Long' <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCHv2 net-next 04/12] sctp: implement make_datafrag for
sctp_stream_interleave
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> Sent: 08 December 2017 16:00
...
> > Is it worth replacing the si struct with an index/enum value, and indexing an
> > array of method pointer structs? That would save you at least one dereference.
>
> Hmmm, maybe, yes. It would be like
> sctp_stream_interleave[asoc->stream.si].make_datafrag(...)
If you only expect 2 choices then an if () is likely
to produce better code that the above.
The actual implementation can be hidden inside a #define
or static inline function.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists