[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171208160856.GC6955@hmswarspite.think-freely.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 11:08:56 -0500
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc: 'Marcelo Ricardo Leitner' <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
'Xin Long' <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 04/12] sctp: implement make_datafrag for
sctp_stream_interleave
On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 04:04:58PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> > Sent: 08 December 2017 16:00
> ...
> > > Is it worth replacing the si struct with an index/enum value, and indexing an
> > > array of method pointer structs? That would save you at least one dereference.
> >
> > Hmmm, maybe, yes. It would be like
> > sctp_stream_interleave[asoc->stream.si].make_datafrag(...)
>
> If you only expect 2 choices then an if () is likely
> to produce better code that the above.
>
> The actual implementation can be hidden inside a #define
> or static inline function.
>
Thats the real question though, will we expect more than two interleaving
strategies? Currently its a boolean operation so the answer seems like yes, but
is there a possiblity of a biased interleaving, or other worthwhile algorithm?
Neil
> David
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists