[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171218.152549.561346578863404231.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 15:25:49 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: helgaas@...nel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Ariel.Elior@...ium.com, everest-linux-l2@...ium.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] qed: Remove unused QED_RDMA_DEV_CAP_* symbols and
dev->dev_caps
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 15:13:54 -0500 (EST)
> From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 17:03:01 -0600
>
>> From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
>>
>> The QED_RDMA_DEV_CAP_* symbols are only used to set bits in dev->dev_caps.
>> Nobody ever looks at those bits. Remove the symbols and dev_caps itself.
>>
>> Note that if these are ever used and added back, it looks incorrect to set
>> QED_RDMA_DEV_CAP_ATOMIC_OP based on PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_LTR_EN. LTR is the
>> Latency Tolerance Reporting mechanism, which has nothing to do with Atomic
>> Ops.
>>
>> No functional change intended.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
>
> Applied to net-next.
Actually, this doesn't build, reverted:
drivers/infiniband/hw/qedr/main.c: In function ‘qedr_set_device_attr’:
drivers/infiniband/hw/qedr/main.c:682:27: error: ‘struct qed_rdma_device’ has no member named ‘dev_caps’
attr->dev_caps = qed_attr->dev_caps;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists