[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171223.105612.1264946295573777970.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 10:56:12 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: steffen.klassert@...unet.com
Cc: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, robsonde@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Revert "xfrm: Fix stack-out-of-bounds read in
xfrm_state_find."
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 10:22:17 +0100
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 11:00:40AM +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote:
>> This reverts commit c9f3f813d462c72dbe412cee6a5cbacf13c4ad5e.
>>
>> This commit breaks transport mode when the policy template
>> has widlcard addresses configured, so revert it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
>
> David, can you please queue this one up for v4.14-stable?
> Commit ID is 94802151894d482e82c324edf2c658f8e6b96508
>
> v4.14 is unusable for some people without this revert.
Yes, but it adds back the stack out-of-bounds bug.
If I queue up the revert, I would also need to queue up whatever
follow-on you used to fix the out-of-bounds bug properly. Which
commit is that?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists