lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 23 Dec 2017 10:56:12 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     steffen.klassert@...unet.com
Cc:     herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, robsonde@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Revert "xfrm: Fix stack-out-of-bounds read in
 xfrm_state_find."

From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 10:22:17 +0100

> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 11:00:40AM +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote:
>> This reverts commit c9f3f813d462c72dbe412cee6a5cbacf13c4ad5e.
>> 
>> This commit breaks transport mode when the policy template
>> has widlcard addresses configured, so revert it.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
> 
> David, can you please queue this one up for v4.14-stable?
> Commit ID is 94802151894d482e82c324edf2c658f8e6b96508
> 
> v4.14 is unusable for some people without this revert.

Yes, but it adds back the stack out-of-bounds bug.

If I queue up the revert, I would also need to queue up whatever
follow-on you used to fix the out-of-bounds bug properly.  Which
commit is that?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ