[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171223160938.rmfwopbmeyepndh5@gauss3.secunet.de>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 17:09:38 +0100
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, <robsonde@...il.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Revert "xfrm: Fix stack-out-of-bounds read in
xfrm_state_find."
On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 10:56:12AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
> Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 10:22:17 +0100
>
> > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 11:00:40AM +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> >> This reverts commit c9f3f813d462c72dbe412cee6a5cbacf13c4ad5e.
> >>
> >> This commit breaks transport mode when the policy template
> >> has widlcard addresses configured, so revert it.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
> >
> > David, can you please queue this one up for v4.14-stable?
> > Commit ID is 94802151894d482e82c324edf2c658f8e6b96508
> >
> > v4.14 is unusable for some people without this revert.
>
> Yes, but it adds back the stack out-of-bounds bug.
>
> If I queue up the revert, I would also need to queue up whatever
> follow-on you used to fix the out-of-bounds bug properly. Which
> commit is that?
This is commit ddc47e4404b58f03e98345398fb12d38fe291512
("xfrm: Fix stack-out-of-bounds read on socket policy lookup.")
It is included in the pull request for the net tree that
I sent yesterday. The patch looks save, but not so sure
if it should go directly to stable. These bugs reported by
the syzbot are usually quite subtile and I already broke
something when I tried to fix the original stack out-of-bounds
bug. So maybe we should wait until the v4.15 release before
backporting...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists