lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171223160938.rmfwopbmeyepndh5@gauss3.secunet.de>
Date:   Sat, 23 Dec 2017 17:09:38 +0100
From:   Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, <robsonde@...il.com>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Revert "xfrm: Fix stack-out-of-bounds read in
 xfrm_state_find."

On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 10:56:12AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
> Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 10:22:17 +0100
> 
> > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 11:00:40AM +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> >> This reverts commit c9f3f813d462c72dbe412cee6a5cbacf13c4ad5e.
> >> 
> >> This commit breaks transport mode when the policy template
> >> has widlcard addresses configured, so revert it.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
> > 
> > David, can you please queue this one up for v4.14-stable?
> > Commit ID is 94802151894d482e82c324edf2c658f8e6b96508
> > 
> > v4.14 is unusable for some people without this revert.
> 
> Yes, but it adds back the stack out-of-bounds bug.
> 
> If I queue up the revert, I would also need to queue up whatever
> follow-on you used to fix the out-of-bounds bug properly.  Which
> commit is that?

This is commit ddc47e4404b58f03e98345398fb12d38fe291512
("xfrm: Fix stack-out-of-bounds read on socket policy lookup.")

It is included in the pull request for the net tree that
I sent yesterday. The patch looks save, but not so sure
if it should go directly to stable. These bugs reported by
the syzbot are usually quite subtile and I already broke
something when I tried to fix the original stack out-of-bounds
bug. So maybe we should wait until the v4.15 release before
backporting...

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ