[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALzJLG8U=CLk-ZG=tiKxLkG_2DzgMkv+Tpka6gEjgfPMrYC+sQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 00:53:47 +0200
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@....mellanox.co.il>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [pull request][for-next V2 00/11] Mellanox, mlx5 E-Switch updates 2017-12-19
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 12:03 AM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 17:01:22 -0500 (EST)
>
>> Pulled, thank you.
>
> Actually, I had to revert. Please fix this and resubmit:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c: In function ‘esw_offloads_load_reps’:
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c:774:2: warning: this ‘for’ clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
> for (rep_type = 0; rep_type < NUM_REP_TYPES; rep_type++)
> ^~~
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c:776:3: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it is guarded by the ‘for’
> if (err)
> ^~
Thanks Dave! this is not just a warning, this is an actual bug. We
will fix and re-spin soon.
Sorry for any inconvenience.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists