lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <41ee1d36-a939-b1f0-4274-f799a96c8a2c@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 29 Dec 2017 12:21:05 -0800
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Jochen Friedrich <jochen@...am.de>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: b53 tags on bpi-r1 (bcm53125)

Hi Jochen,

Le 12/18/17 à 02:44, Jochen Friedrich a écrit :
> Hi Florian,
> 
> unfortunately, this doesn't make any difference.
> 
> Just out of curiosity, BPI-R1 has pull-down resistors on LED6 and 7
> (MII_MODE0/1). However, the public available 53125U sheet doesn't
> document these pins:
> 
> LED[6] IMP_MODE[0] Pull-up Active low (since IMP Mode is not used)
> LED[7] IMP_MODE[1] Pull-up Active low (since IMP Mode is not used)
> 
> Is this MII mode maybe incompatible with Broadcom tags?

AFAICT, it should not, this is largely independent from enabling
Broadcom tags.

I have now reproduced this on my BPI-R1 as well and am looking at what
might be going wrong.

Thanks!
-- 
Florian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ