netdev - Re: bonding: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in bond_update_slave

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAF2d9jh1EHUx3BzWghBWRAZt4acO6W-_eUXtD7dk2YBJZfuwsg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 3 Jan 2018 11:28:18 -0800
From:   Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) 
        <maheshb@...gle.com>
To:     SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc:     linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
        Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
        Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bonding: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation
 in bond_update_slave_arr()

On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 12:45 AM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>>> Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in this function.
>>>
>>> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>>>
>> What is the issue with this message?
>
> * Is it redundant?
>
> * Would a Linux allocation failure report be already sufficient here?
>
If you see 8 out of 9 call sites in this file ignore the return value.
This message in the log could give a clue when debugging. Unless it's
spamming it's not harmful, or is it?

> Regards,
> Markus