netdev - Re: [net-next: PATCH 0/8] Armada 7k/8k PP2 ACPI support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180104160939.GA7785@xora-haswell>
Date:   Thu, 4 Jan 2018 16:09:39 +0000
From:   Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>
To:     Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>
Cc:     Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "<netdev@...r.kernel.org>" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Antoine Ténart 
        <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
        Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
        Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>,
        Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
        Neta Zur Hershkovits <neta@...vell.com>,
        Grzegorz Jaszczyk <jaz@...ihalf.com>,
        Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next: PATCH 0/8] Armada 7k/8k PP2 ACPI support

On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 12:12:06PM +0100, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
> Hi Graeme,
> 
> 2018-01-03 12:00 GMT+01:00 Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>:
> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 10:40:31AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> On 18 December 2017 at 10:17, Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > This patchset introduces ACPI support in mvpp2 and mvmdio drivers.
> >> > First three patches introduce fwnode helpers for obtaining PHY
> >> > information from nodes and also MDIO fwnode API for registering
> >> > the bus with its PHY/devices.
> >> >
> >> > Following patches update code of the mvmdio and mvpp2 drivers
> >> > to support ACPI tables handling. The latter is done in 4 steps,
> >> > as can be seen in the commits. For the details, please
> >> > refer to the commit messages.
> >> >
> >> > Drivers operation was tested on top of the net-next branch
> >> > with both DT and ACPI. Although for compatibility reasons
> >> > with older platforms, the mvmdio driver keeps using
> >> > of_ MDIO registering, new fwnode_ one proved to fully work
> >> > with DT as well (tested on MacchiatoBin board).
> >> >
> >> > mvpp2/mvmdio driver can work with the ACPI representation, as exposed
> >> > on a public branch:
> >> > https://github.com/MarvellEmbeddedProcessors/edk2-open-platform/commits/marvell-armada-wip
> >> > It was compiled together with the most recent Tianocore EDK2 revision.
> >> > Please refer to the firmware build instruction on MacchiatoBin board:
> >> > http://wiki.macchiatobin.net/tiki-index.php?page=Build+from+source+-+UEFI+EDK+II
> >> >
> >> > Above support configures 1G to use its PHY normally. 10G can work now
> >> > only with the link interrupt mode. Somehow reading of the
> >> > string property in fwnode_mdiobus_child_is_phy works only with
> >> > DT and cannot cope with 10G PHY nodes as in:
> >> > https://pastebin.com/3JnYpU0A
> >> >
> >> > Above root cause will be further checked. In the meantime I will
> >> > appreciate any comments or remarks for the kernel patches.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Hi Marcin,
> >>
> >> I have added linux-acpi and Graeme to cc. I think it makes sense to
> >> discuss the way you describe the device topology before looking at the
> >> patches in more detail.
> >>
> >> In particular, I would like to request feedback on the use of
> >> [redundant] 'reg' properties and the use of _DSD + compatible to
> >> describe PHYs. Usually, we try to avoid this, given that it is
> >> essentially a ACPI encapsulated DT dialect that is difficult to
> >> support in drivers unless they are based on DT to begin with. Also,
> >> non-standard _DSD properties require a vendor prefix, it is not
> >> freeform.
> >>
> >> For reference, the ACPI description is here (starting at line 175)
> >> https://github.com/MarvellEmbeddedProcessors/edk2-open-platform/blob/72d5ac23b20dd74d479daa5e40ba443264b31261/Platforms/Marvell/Armada/AcpiTables/Armada80x0McBin/Dsdt.asl
> >>
> > So the representation of PHY's with _DSD was kind of formalised here
> >
> > http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/nic-request-v2.pdf
> >
> > This is already in use in the kernel, and that DSDT seems to be along the same
> > lines. So seems ok in that manner.
> >
> > The "reg", 0 property seems a little odd, it would probably make more
> > sense to check for the lack of ranges passed in in ACPI manner _CRS.
> >
> 
> I already agreed with 'reg' being awkward in the later emails.
> Wouldn't _ADR be more appropriate to specify PHY address on MDIO bus?
> 
Ah it is an actual address, then yes _ADR is probably more appropriate.

Graeme


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)