[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c3383127-03e2-9495-37c6-7f3a2f4b10d4@mojatatu.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2018 13:31:20 -0500
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com, andrew@...n.ch,
vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
michael.chan@...adcom.com, ganeshgr@...lsio.com,
saeedm@...lanox.com, matanb@...lanox.com, leonro@...lanox.com,
idosch@...lanox.com, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com,
simon.horman@...ronome.com, pieter.jansenvanvuuren@...ronome.com,
john.hurley@...ronome.com, alexander.h.duyck@...el.com,
ogerlitz@...lanox.com, john.fastabend@...il.com,
daniel@...earbox.net
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v6 00/11] net: sched: allow qdiscs to share
filter block instances
On 18-01-06 01:02 PM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> On 18-01-06 04:48 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>
> BTW: From your output, DavidA, i noticed something strange:
> two flower filters with the same handle id 0x1 (different prios)
At least on the kernel i am using this is the exhibited default
behavior. I can also create filters with different priorities
and with different handle ids.
> and also two filters with the same prio (but different handles).
This does not seem possible (as i was expecting) - so could be
the result of the block code...
cheers,
jamal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists