netdev - Re: [patch net-next v6 00/11] net: sched: allow qdiscs to share filter block instances

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c2a8da56-0331-3e5f-fc1f-2ec5458cf92d@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 6 Jan 2018 12:29:03 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com, andrew@...n.ch,
        vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        michael.chan@...adcom.com, ganeshgr@...lsio.com,
        saeedm@...lanox.com, matanb@...lanox.com, leonro@...lanox.com,
        idosch@...lanox.com, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com,
        simon.horman@...ronome.com, pieter.jansenvanvuuren@...ronome.com,
        john.hurley@...ronome.com, alexander.h.duyck@...el.com,
        ogerlitz@...lanox.com, john.fastabend@...il.com,
        daniel@...earbox.net
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v6 00/11] net: sched: allow qdiscs to share
 filter block instances

On 1/6/18 11:02 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> BTW: From your output, DavidA, i noticed something strange:
> two flower filters with the same handle id 0x1 (different prios)
> and also two filters with the same prio (but different handles).
> I see one was added using :dev .." - how were the other 2 added?
> Consequence of patch, maybe?

Not clear from the command history. I was running commands (add by
device and add by block) in various orders to see what happens.


> 
> Note:
> Expected behavior is two filters of same kind on the same chain
> should be distinguished by priority. There are filters like u32
> (which hide hash tables under the same priority) which may
> allow the same prio for multiple handles - just dont see that
> fit with flower, but maybe missing something.
> 
> cheers,
> jamal