netdev - [PATCH net-next 2/3] net/mlx4_en: Align behavior of set ring size flow via ethtool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1515420026-11970-3-git-send-email-tariqt@mellanox.com>
Date:   Mon,  8 Jan 2018 16:00:25 +0200
From:   Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
To:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>,
        Eugenia Emantayev <eugenia@...lanox.com>,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/3] net/mlx4_en: Align behavior of set ring size flow via ethtool

From: Eugenia Emantayev <eugenia@...lanox.com>

In current implementation, any requested RX/TX ring size value
that is less than minimum is silently casted to nearest valid value.
Update this behavior to align with mlx5 behavior by printing warning
in dmesg and remaining the size unchanged.
Kernel is responsible for verifying against the maximum.

Signed-off-by: Eugenia Emantayev <eugenia@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_ethtool.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_ethtool.c
index bf1f04164885..ebc1f566a4d9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_ethtool.c
@@ -1094,12 +1094,21 @@ static int mlx4_en_set_ringparam(struct net_device *dev,
 	if (param->rx_jumbo_pending || param->rx_mini_pending)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	if (param->rx_pending < MLX4_EN_MIN_RX_SIZE) {
+		en_warn(priv, "%s: rx_pending (%d) < min (%d)\n",
+			__func__, param->rx_pending,
+			MLX4_EN_MIN_RX_SIZE);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+	if (param->tx_pending < MLX4_EN_MIN_TX_SIZE) {
+		en_warn(priv, "%s: tx_pending (%d) < min (%lu)\n",
+			__func__, param->tx_pending,
+			MLX4_EN_MIN_TX_SIZE);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	rx_size = roundup_pow_of_two(param->rx_pending);
-	rx_size = max_t(u32, rx_size, MLX4_EN_MIN_RX_SIZE);
-	rx_size = min_t(u32, rx_size, MLX4_EN_MAX_RX_SIZE);
 	tx_size = roundup_pow_of_two(param->tx_pending);
-	tx_size = max_t(u32, tx_size, MLX4_EN_MIN_TX_SIZE);
-	tx_size = min_t(u32, tx_size, MLX4_EN_MAX_TX_SIZE);
 
 	if (rx_size == (priv->port_up ? priv->rx_ring[0]->actual_size :
 					priv->rx_ring[0]->size) &&
-- 
1.8.3.1