netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/6] net: Fix netdev_WARN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 9 Jan 2018 11:51:36 +0200
From:   Gal Pressman <galp@...lanox.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, joe@...ches.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, tariqt@...lanox.com, saeedm@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/6] net: Fix netdev_WARN_ONCE macro

On 09-Jan-18 05:05, David Miller wrote:
> From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2018 18:42:01 -0800
> 
>> On Sun, 2018-01-07 at 12:08 +0200, Gal Pressman wrote:
>>> netdev_WARN_ONCE is broken (whoops..), this fix will remove the
>>> unnecessary "condition" parameter, add the missing comma and change
>>> "arg" to "args".
>>>
>>> Fixes: 375ef2b1f0d0 ("net: Introduce netdev_*_once functions")
>>> Signed-off-by: Gal Pressman <galp@...lanox.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
>>> ---
>>>  include/linux/netdevice.h | 4 ++--
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>>> index 352066e..5ff1ef9 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>>> @@ -4407,8 +4407,8 @@ do {								\
>>>  	WARN(1, "netdevice: %s%s\n" format, netdev_name(dev),	\
>>>  	     netdev_reg_state(dev), ##args)
>>>  
>>> -#define netdev_WARN_ONCE(dev, condition, format, arg...)		\
>>> -	WARN_ONCE(1, "netdevice: %s%s\n" format, netdev_name(dev)	\
>>> +#define netdev_WARN_ONCE(dev, format, args...)				\
>>> +	WARN_ONCE(1, "netdevice: %s%s\n" format, netdev_name(dev),	\
>>
>> You sure you want the newline before the format?
> 
> Hmmm, Gal please send me a relative fix for this.
> 

The newline is removed in the next patch, which handles the formatting of both macros.
Do you want to remove it as part of this bug fix?