netdev - Re: [PATCH 13/36] befs: Define usercopy region in befs_inode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <490acc77-1198-e53e-c965-aef9c1ebf5fd@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 10 Jan 2018 10:53:23 +0000
From:   Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@...nel.org>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     David Windsor <dave@...lcore.net>,
        Salah Triki <salah.triki@...il.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
        Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
        Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/36] befs: Define usercopy region in befs_inode_cache
 slab cache

On 01/09/2018 08:55 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> From: David Windsor <dave@...lcore.net>
> 
> befs symlink pathnames, stored in struct befs_inode_info.i_data.symlink
> and therefore contained in the befs_inode_cache slab cache, need to be
> copied to/from userspace.
> 
> cache object allocation:
>     fs/befs/linuxvfs.c:
>         befs_alloc_inode(...):
>             ...
>             bi = kmem_cache_alloc(befs_inode_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
>             ...
>             return &bi->vfs_inode;
> 
>         befs_iget(...):
>             ...
>             strlcpy(befs_ino->i_data.symlink, raw_inode->data.symlink,
>                     BEFS_SYMLINK_LEN);
>             ...
>             inode->i_link = befs_ino->i_data.symlink;
> 
> example usage trace:
>     readlink_copy+0x43/0x70
>     vfs_readlink+0x62/0x110
>     SyS_readlinkat+0x100/0x130
> 
>     fs/namei.c:
>         readlink_copy(..., link):
>             ...
>             copy_to_user(..., link, len);
> 
>         (inlined in vfs_readlink)
>         generic_readlink(dentry, ...):
>             struct inode *inode = d_inode(dentry);
>             const char *link = inode->i_link;
>             ...
>             readlink_copy(..., link);
> 
> In support of usercopy hardening, this patch defines a region in the
> befs_inode_cache slab cache in which userspace copy operations are
> allowed.
> 
> This region is known as the slab cache's usercopy region. Slab caches
> can now check that each dynamically sized copy operation involving
> cache-managed memory falls entirely within the slab's usercopy region.
> 
> This patch is modified from Brad Spengler/PaX Team's PAX_USERCOPY
> whitelisting code in the last public patch of grsecurity/PaX based on my
> understanding of the code. Changes or omissions from the original code are
> mine and don't reflect the original grsecurity/PaX code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Windsor <dave@...lcore.net>
> [kees: adjust commit log, provide usage trace]
> Cc: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@...nel.org>
> Cc: Salah Triki <salah.triki@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Acked-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@...nel.org>
> ---
>  fs/befs/linuxvfs.c | 14 +++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/befs/linuxvfs.c b/fs/befs/linuxvfs.c
> index ee236231cafa..af2832aaeec5 100644
> --- a/fs/befs/linuxvfs.c
> +++ b/fs/befs/linuxvfs.c
> @@ -444,11 +444,15 @@ static struct inode *befs_iget(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino)
>  static int __init
>  befs_init_inodecache(void)
>  {
> -	befs_inode_cachep = kmem_cache_create("befs_inode_cache",
> -					      sizeof (struct befs_inode_info),
> -					      0, (SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT|
> -						SLAB_MEM_SPREAD|SLAB_ACCOUNT),
> -					      init_once);
> +	befs_inode_cachep = kmem_cache_create_usercopy("befs_inode_cache",
> +				sizeof(struct befs_inode_info), 0,
> +				(SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT|SLAB_MEM_SPREAD|
> +					SLAB_ACCOUNT),
> +				offsetof(struct befs_inode_info,
> +					i_data.symlink),
> +				sizeof_field(struct befs_inode_info,
> +					i_data.symlink),
> +				init_once);
>  	if (befs_inode_cachep == NULL)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> 

Hi Kees,

I've tested this and it works well.

You can have me as:
Signed-off-by, Tested-by, or the current Acked-by. Whatever you think is better.

Thanks for the great work. Your rock!

Luis