netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] net: sched: cls: add extack support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c95bc0c2-83a4-3dea-2405-5f505994771b@mojatatu.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Jan 2018 17:12:57 -0500
From:   Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl>,
        Alexander Aring <aring@...atatu.com>
Cc:     xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us, davem@...emloft.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...atatu.com,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] net: sched: cls: add extack support

On 18-01-16 04:46 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 12:20:19 -0500, Alexander Aring wrote:

[..]

> Ugh, this is going to conflict with our series too :(  (and I CCed you
> on ours)
> 
> Would it be OK for you to hold off until Jiri's code gets merged and
> ours comes down via bpf-next?  That shouldn't take long at all.  The
> conflicts between bpf/bpf-next/net-next are really taking their toll
> on us this release cycles, I would really appreciate if we could make
> some progress on this relatively simple series at least...
> 

I would say precedence should be Jiri's patches, Alex's patches
and then yours:
Alex's patches fix the core (cls_api.c) area with proper extack
for the core and then he has one patch to cover a specific
use case of the u32 classifier extack. Yours is only concerned
with one use case - bpf which depend on the core (that is in Alex's
patches)

cheers,
jamal