[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1516200470.4184.26.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 14:47:50 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@...com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation
> (c) isn't actually done in any real CPU's today that I'm aware of
> (unless you want to call the return stack data speculation).
There are processors out there today that data speculate.
For Intel family 6 Core, Knights and Atom today all is good.
Alan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists