[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8db828ea-d395-96ab-3131-6b82213a06ab@fb.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:29:58 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation
On 1/10/18 11:47 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi again Linus, Alexei,
>
> I can happily confirm that there aren't any (ARM architecture) CPUs where
> the masking approach is not sufficient, so there's no need to worry about
> value speculation breaking this.
Awesome! Thank you for confirming.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists