lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180118234347.bfflmqxk3kd7kbab@kafai-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 Jan 2018 15:43:47 -0800
From:   Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
To:     Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>
CC:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: don't let tb6_root node share routes with
 other node

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 03:31:29PM -0800, Wei Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 2:47 PM, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:40:03AM -0800, Wei Wang wrote:
> >> From: Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>
> >>
> >> After commit 4512c43eac7e, if we add a route to the subtree of tb6_root
> >> which does not have any route attached to it yet, the current code will
> >> let tb6_root and the node in the subtree share the same route.
> >> This could cause problem cause tb6_root has RTN_INFO flag marked and the
> > You meant the RTN_RTINFO check in fib6_purge_rt()?
> >
> Yes. Exactly.
Looks good to me.  Thanks for the fix!

Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ