netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: vrf: Add support for sends to local broadcast address

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fcfa71a6-dd97-5d00-880e-7b1c4e97f186@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Jan 2018 15:01:23 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: vrf: Add support for sends to local
 broadcast address

On 1/25/18 2:23 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
> Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 19:37:37 -0800
> 
>> Sukumar reported that sends to the local broadcast address
>> (255.255.255.255) are broken. Check for the address in vrf driver
>> and do not redirect to the VRF device - similar to multicast
>> packets.
>>
>> With this change sockets can use SO_BINDTODEVICE to specify an
>> egress interface and receive responses. Note: the egress interface
>> can not be a VRF device but needs to be the enslaved device.
>>
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198521
>>
>> Reported-by: Sukumar Gopalakrishnan <sukumarg1973@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
>>
>> ---
>> Dave: Really this is a day 1 bug that goes back to the beginning of VRF.
>> IMO, backport to the 4.14 LTS kernel is sufficient; the multicast
>> handling for IPv4 was only complete as of the 4.12 kernel. I directed
>> this at net-next because it is not urgent for the 4.15 merge window.
> 
> You have to decide, either this is for 'net' and -stable, or it isn't.
> 
> We don't put things into net-next and then -stable backport it.  It
> doesn't work like that.
> 

Please take this one for -net and patch 2 for net-next (it's a new
feature). I can re-send as separate patches if needed.