[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180125.162309.696135022243773090.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 16:23:09 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: dsahern@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: vrf: Add support for sends to local
broadcast address
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 19:37:37 -0800
> Sukumar reported that sends to the local broadcast address
> (255.255.255.255) are broken. Check for the address in vrf driver
> and do not redirect to the VRF device - similar to multicast
> packets.
>
> With this change sockets can use SO_BINDTODEVICE to specify an
> egress interface and receive responses. Note: the egress interface
> can not be a VRF device but needs to be the enslaved device.
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198521
>
> Reported-by: Sukumar Gopalakrishnan <sukumarg1973@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
>
> ---
> Dave: Really this is a day 1 bug that goes back to the beginning of VRF.
> IMO, backport to the 4.14 LTS kernel is sufficient; the multicast
> handling for IPv4 was only complete as of the 4.12 kernel. I directed
> this at net-next because it is not urgent for the 4.15 merge window.
You have to decide, either this is for 'net' and -stable, or it isn't.
We don't put things into net-next and then -stable backport it. It
doesn't work like that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists