| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20180126230608.2175374-3-yhs@fb.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 15:06:08 -0800
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To: <ast@...com>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] tools/bpf: add a multithreaded stress test in bpf selftests test_lpm_map
The new test will spawn four threads, doing map update, delete, lookup
and get_next_key in parallel. It is able to reproduce the issue in the
previous commit found by syzbot and Eric Dumazet.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
index 9868835..bf05bc5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ ifneq ($(wildcard $(GENHDR)),)
endif
CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 -I$(APIDIR) -I$(LIBDIR) -I$(GENDIR) $(GENFLAGS) -I../../../include
-LDLIBS += -lcap -lelf -lrt
+LDLIBS += -lcap -lelf -lrt -lpthread
TEST_GEN_PROGS = test_verifier test_tag test_maps test_lru_map test_lpm_map test_progs \
test_align test_verifier_log test_dev_cgroup test_tcpbpf_user
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c
index 0815108..2be87e9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include <errno.h>
#include <inttypes.h>
#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <pthread.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
@@ -641,6 +642,98 @@ static void test_lpm_get_next_key(void)
close(map_fd);
}
+#define MAX_TEST_KEYS 4
+struct lpm_mt_test_info {
+ int cmd; /* 0: update, 1: delete, 2: lookup, 3: get_next_key */
+ int iter;
+ int map_fd;
+ struct {
+ __u32 prefixlen;
+ __u32 data;
+ } key[MAX_TEST_KEYS];
+};
+
+static void *lpm_test_command(void *arg)
+{
+ int i, j, ret, iter, key_size;
+ struct lpm_mt_test_info *info = arg;
+ struct bpf_lpm_trie_key *key_p;
+
+ key_size = sizeof(struct bpf_lpm_trie_key) + sizeof(__u32);
+ key_p = alloca(key_size);
+ for (iter = 0; iter < info->iter; iter++)
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_TEST_KEYS; i++) {
+ /* first half of iterations in forward order,
+ * and second half in backward order.
+ */
+ j = (iter < (info->iter / 2)) ? i : MAX_TEST_KEYS - i - 1;
+ key_p->prefixlen = info->key[j].prefixlen;
+ memcpy(key_p->data, &info->key[j].data, sizeof(__u32));
+ if (info->cmd == 0) {
+ __u32 value = j;
+ /* update must succeed */
+ assert(bpf_map_update_elem(info->map_fd, key_p, &value, 0) == 0);
+ } else if (info->cmd == 1) {
+ ret = bpf_map_delete_elem(info->map_fd, key_p);
+ assert(ret == 0 || errno == ENOENT);
+ } else if (info->cmd == 2) {
+ __u32 value;
+ ret = bpf_map_lookup_elem(info->map_fd, key_p, &value);
+ assert(ret == 0 || errno == ENOENT);
+ } else {
+ struct bpf_lpm_trie_key *next_key_p = alloca(key_size);
+ ret = bpf_map_get_next_key(info->map_fd, key_p, next_key_p);
+ assert(ret == 0 || errno == ENOENT || errno == ENOMEM);
+ }
+ }
+
+ // Pass successful exit info back to the main thread
+ pthread_exit((void *)info);
+}
+
+static void setup_lpm_mt_test_info(struct lpm_mt_test_info *info, int map_fd)
+{
+ info->iter = 2000;
+ info->map_fd = map_fd;
+ info->key[0].prefixlen = 16;
+ inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.168.0.0", &info->key[0].data);
+ info->key[1].prefixlen = 24;
+ inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.168.0.0", &info->key[1].data);
+ info->key[2].prefixlen = 24;
+ inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.168.128.0", &info->key[2].data);
+ info->key[3].prefixlen = 24;
+ inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.168.1.0", &info->key[3].data);
+}
+
+static void test_lpm_multi_thread(void)
+{
+ struct lpm_mt_test_info info[4];
+ size_t key_size, value_size;
+ pthread_t thread_id[4];
+ int i, map_fd;
+ void *ret;
+
+ /* create a trie */
+ value_size = sizeof(__u32);
+ key_size = sizeof(struct bpf_lpm_trie_key) + value_size;
+ map_fd = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_LPM_TRIE, key_size, value_size,
+ 100, BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC);
+
+ /* create 4 threads to test update, delete, lookup and get_next_key */
+ setup_lpm_mt_test_info(&info[0], map_fd);
+ for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
+ if (i != 0)
+ memcpy(&info[i], &info[0], sizeof(info[i]));
+ info[i].cmd = i;
+ assert(pthread_create(&thread_id[i], NULL, &lpm_test_command, &info[i]) == 0);
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
+ assert(pthread_join(thread_id[i], &ret) == 0 && ret == (void *)&info[i]);
+
+ close(map_fd);
+}
+
int main(void)
{
struct rlimit limit = { RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY };
@@ -667,6 +760,8 @@ int main(void)
test_lpm_get_next_key();
+ test_lpm_multi_thread();
+
printf("test_lpm: OK\n");
return 0;
}
--
2.9.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists