netdev - [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: fix kernel page fault in lpm map trie_get_next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180126230608.2175374-2-yhs@fb.com>
Date:   Fri, 26 Jan 2018 15:06:07 -0800
From:   Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To:     <ast@...com>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: fix kernel page fault in lpm map trie_get_next_key

Commit b471f2f1de8b ("bpf: implement MAP_GET_NEXT_KEY command
for LPM_TRIE map") introduces a bug likes below:

    if (!rcu_dereference(trie->root))
        return -ENOENT;
    if (!key || key->prefixlen > trie->max_prefixlen) {
        root = &trie->root;
        goto find_leftmost;
    }
    ......
  find_leftmost:
    for (node = rcu_dereference(*root); node;) {

In the code after label find_leftmost, it is assumed
that *root should not be NULL, but it is not true as
it is possbile trie->root is changed to NULL by an
asynchronous delete operation.

The issue is reported by syzbot and Eric Dumazet with the
below error log:
  ......
  kasan: CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE enabled
  kasan: GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory access
  general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN
  Dumping ftrace buffer:
     (ftrace buffer empty)
  Modules linked in:
  CPU: 1 PID: 8033 Comm: syz-executor3 Not tainted 4.15.0-rc8+ #4
  Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
  RIP: 0010:trie_get_next_key+0x3c2/0xf10 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:682
  ......

This patch fixed the issue by use local rcu_dereferenced
pointer instead of *(&trie->root) later on.

Fixes: b471f2f1de8b ("bpf: implement MAP_GET_NEXT_KEY command or LPM_TRIE map")
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Reported-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
---
 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c | 26 +++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c b/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
index 8f083ea..7b469d1 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
@@ -593,11 +593,10 @@ static void trie_free(struct bpf_map *map)
 
 static int trie_get_next_key(struct bpf_map *map, void *_key, void *_next_key)
 {
+	struct lpm_trie_node *node, *next_node = NULL, *parent, *search_root;
 	struct lpm_trie *trie = container_of(map, struct lpm_trie, map);
 	struct bpf_lpm_trie_key *key = _key, *next_key = _next_key;
-	struct lpm_trie_node *node, *next_node = NULL, *parent;
 	struct lpm_trie_node **node_stack = NULL;
-	struct lpm_trie_node __rcu **root;
 	int err = 0, stack_ptr = -1;
 	unsigned int next_bit;
 	size_t matchlen;
@@ -614,14 +613,13 @@ static int trie_get_next_key(struct bpf_map *map, void *_key, void *_next_key)
 	 */
 
 	/* Empty trie */
-	if (!rcu_dereference(trie->root))
+	search_root = rcu_dereference(trie->root);
+	if (!search_root)
 		return -ENOENT;
 
 	/* For invalid key, find the leftmost node in the trie */
-	if (!key || key->prefixlen > trie->max_prefixlen) {
-		root = &trie->root;
+	if (!key || key->prefixlen > trie->max_prefixlen)
 		goto find_leftmost;
-	}
 
 	node_stack = kmalloc(trie->max_prefixlen * sizeof(struct lpm_trie_node *),
 			     GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN);
@@ -629,7 +627,7 @@ static int trie_get_next_key(struct bpf_map *map, void *_key, void *_next_key)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	/* Try to find the exact node for the given key */
-	for (node = rcu_dereference(trie->root); node;) {
+	for (node = search_root; node;) {
 		node_stack[++stack_ptr] = node;
 		matchlen = longest_prefix_match(trie, node, key);
 		if (node->prefixlen != matchlen ||
@@ -640,10 +638,8 @@ static int trie_get_next_key(struct bpf_map *map, void *_key, void *_next_key)
 		node = rcu_dereference(node->child[next_bit]);
 	}
 	if (!node || node->prefixlen != key->prefixlen ||
-	    (node->flags & LPM_TREE_NODE_FLAG_IM)) {
-		root = &trie->root;
+	    (node->flags & LPM_TREE_NODE_FLAG_IM))
 		goto find_leftmost;
-	}
 
 	/* The node with the exactly-matching key has been found,
 	 * find the first node in postorder after the matched node.
@@ -651,10 +647,10 @@ static int trie_get_next_key(struct bpf_map *map, void *_key, void *_next_key)
 	node = node_stack[stack_ptr];
 	while (stack_ptr > 0) {
 		parent = node_stack[stack_ptr - 1];
-		if (rcu_dereference(parent->child[0]) == node &&
-		    rcu_dereference(parent->child[1])) {
-			root = &parent->child[1];
-			goto find_leftmost;
+		if (rcu_dereference(parent->child[0]) == node) {
+			search_root = rcu_dereference(parent->child[1]);
+			if (search_root)
+				goto find_leftmost;
 		}
 		if (!(parent->flags & LPM_TREE_NODE_FLAG_IM)) {
 			next_node = parent;
@@ -673,7 +669,7 @@ static int trie_get_next_key(struct bpf_map *map, void *_key, void *_next_key)
 	/* Find the leftmost non-intermediate node, all intermediate nodes
 	 * have exact two children, so this function will never return NULL.
 	 */
-	for (node = rcu_dereference(*root); node;) {
+	for (node = search_root; node;) {
 		if (!(node->flags & LPM_TREE_NODE_FLAG_IM))
 			next_node = node;
 		node = rcu_dereference(node->child[0]);
-- 
2.9.5