[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1794415.MYW8eb4nQC@blindfold>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 22:58:56 +0100
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, Joern Engel <joern@...ybastard.org>,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>,
Solarflare linux maintainers <linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com>,
Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>,
Bert Kenward <bkenward@...arflare.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] mtd: Stop assuming mtd_erase() is asynchronous
Am Montag, 12. Februar 2018, 22:03:09 CET schrieb Boris Brezillon:
> None of the mtd->_erase() implementations work in an asynchronous manner,
> so let's simplify MTD users that call mtd_erase(). All they need to do
> is check the value returned by mtd_erase() and assume that != 0 means
> failure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Thanks,
//richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists