netdev - Re: [PATCH 4/5] mtd: Unconditionally update ->fail_addr and ->addr in part

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1548497.hsdsyCj9Tz@blindfold>
Date:   Mon, 12 Feb 2018 23:05:19 +0100
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:     Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
Cc:     David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr>,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, Joern Engel <joern@...ybastard.org>,
        Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
        Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>,
        Solarflare linux maintainers <linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com>,
        Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>,
        Bert Kenward <bkenward@...arflare.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] mtd: Unconditionally update ->fail_addr and ->addr in part_erase()

Am Montag, 12. Februar 2018, 22:03:10 CET schrieb Boris Brezillon:
> ->fail_addr and ->addr can be updated no matter the result of
> parent->_erase(), we just need to remove the code doing the same thing
> in mtd_erase_callback() to avoid adjusting those fields twice.
> 
> Note that this can be done because all MTD users have been converted to
> not pass an erase_info->callback() and are thus only taking the
> ->addr_fail and ->addr fields into account after part_erase() has
> returned.
> 
> While we're at it, get rid of the erase_info->mtd field which was only
> needed to let mtd_erase_callback() get the partition device back.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>

Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>

Thanks,
//richard