lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4964697.hB4CnsZvNY@natalenko.name>
Date:   Tue, 20 Feb 2018 20:35:14 +0100
From:   Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
        Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
        Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] tcp: remove non GSO code

Hi.

On úterý 20. února 2018 19:57:42 CET Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Actually timer drifts are not horrible (at least on my lab hosts)
> 
> But BBR has a pessimistic way to sense the burst size, as it is tied to
> TSO/GSO being there.
> 
> Following patch helps a lot.

Not really, at least if applied to v4.15.4. Still getting 2 Gbps less between 
VMs if using BBR instead of Reno.

Am I doing something wrong?

Oleksandr


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ