netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] r8169: remove not needed PHY soft reset in rtl8168e_2_hw_phy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180220.232748.29423773548892357.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Tue, 20 Feb 2018 23:27:48 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     hkallweit1@...il.com
Cc:     nic_swsd@...ltek.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] r8169: remove not needed PHY soft reset in
 rtl8168e_2_hw_phy_config

From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 07:30:16 +0100

> rtl8169_init_phy() resets the PHY anyway after applying the chip-specific
> PHY configuration. So we don't need to soft-reset the PHY as part of the
> chip-specific configuration.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>

I'm not so comfortable with this.

There are so many r8169 chip variants out there.

And who knows, maybe one of them needs this second PHY reset or due to
some way the driver is coded it is necessary.

Unless you can test this change on every r8169 chip type, I'm very
reluctant to apply this patch.

Sorry.