[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2077050.JV33r27xBe@natalenko.name>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 07:14:49 +0100
From: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] tcp: remove non GSO code
Hi.
On středa 21. února 2018 0:21:37 CET Eric Dumazet wrote:
> My latest patch (fixing BBR underestimation of cwnd)
> was meant for net tree, on a NIC where SG/TSO/GSO) are disabled.
>
> ( ie when sk->sk_gso_max_segs is not set to 'infinite' )
>
> It is packet scheduler independent really.
>
> Tested here with pfifo_fast, TSO/GSO off.
Well, before the patch with BBR and sg off here it is ~450 Mbps for fq and
~115 Mbps for pfifo_fast. So, comparing to what I see with the patch (850 and
200 respectively), it is definitely an improvement.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists