netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: allow interface to be set into vrf if a vif in same vrf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <18fbff9e-b44f-1656-e3cb-12bef4dc8733@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 26 Feb 2018 09:53:04 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Mike Manning <mmanning@...tta.mail-att.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: allow interface to be set into vrf if a vif in same
 vrf

On 2/26/18 9:48 AM, Mike Manning wrote:
> Setting an interface into a vrf fails with 'RTNETLINK answers: File
> exists' if one of its vifs is already in the same vrf. As the vrf is an
> upper device of the vif, it is also showing up as an upper device of
> the interface itself. The solution is to restrict this check to devices
> other than master. As only one master device can be linked to a device,
> in this case the check is for the upper device (vrf) to be linked to as
> being the master device rather than any other upper device.

I'm not understanding what you mean by vif in this context. Can you
elaborate and show an example set of commands?


> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Manning <mmanning@....com>
> ---
>  net/core/dev.c | 14 +++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index d4362be..2cedf52 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -6396,6 +6396,7 @@ static int __netdev_upper_dev_link(struct net_device *dev,
>  		.linking = true,
>  		.upper_info = upper_info,
>  	};
> +	struct net_device *master_dev;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	ASSERT_RTNL();
> @@ -6407,11 +6408,14 @@ static int __netdev_upper_dev_link(struct net_device *dev,
>  	if (netdev_has_upper_dev(upper_dev, dev))
>  		return -EBUSY;
>  
> -	if (netdev_has_upper_dev(dev, upper_dev))
> -		return -EEXIST;
> -
> -	if (master && netdev_master_upper_dev_get(dev))
> -		return -EBUSY;
> +	if (!master) {
> +		if (netdev_has_upper_dev(dev, upper_dev))
> +			return -EEXIST;
> +	} else {
> +		master_dev = netdev_master_upper_dev_get(dev);
> +		if (master_dev)
> +			return master_dev == upper_dev ? -EEXIST : -EBUSY;
> +	}
>  
>  	ret = call_netdevice_notifiers_info(NETDEV_PRECHANGEUPPER,
>  					    &changeupper_info.info);
>