lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180228071241.GC19654@nanopsycho>
Date:   Wed, 28 Feb 2018 08:12:41 +0100
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl>
Cc:     Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>, Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, jiri@...lanox.com, dsahern@...il.com,
        mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] team: Use extack to report enslavement failures

Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:49:59AM CET, kubakici@...pl wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 22:22:12 +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
>> > If so, for how long? They should certainly be removed eventually. How
>> > do we ensure we don't forget?
>> > 
>> > Seems to me it would be better to remove them right now.  
>> 
>> I can do that unless someone objects.
>
>I don't object, but FWIW keep in mind extack errors don't show if
>libmnl is not installed..

Yeah, or if you have an older iproute2 package. I would keep the existing
dmesg msgs for now. In the future, when everyone is used to exacks, then
we can remove them.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ