[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180228071241.GC19654@nanopsycho>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 08:12:41 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl>
Cc: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>, Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, jiri@...lanox.com, dsahern@...il.com,
mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] team: Use extack to report enslavement failures
Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:49:59AM CET, kubakici@...pl wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 22:22:12 +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
>> > If so, for how long? They should certainly be removed eventually. How
>> > do we ensure we don't forget?
>> >
>> > Seems to me it would be better to remove them right now.
>>
>> I can do that unless someone objects.
>
>I don't object, but FWIW keep in mind extack errors don't show if
>libmnl is not installed..
Yeah, or if you have an older iproute2 package. I would keep the existing
dmesg msgs for now. In the future, when everyone is used to exacks, then
we can remove them.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists