[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <85d10mqxuf.fsf@sevai.TCC.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2018 10:52:08 -0500
From: Roman Mashak <mrv@...atatu.com>
To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, jhs@...atatu.com,
jiri@...nulli.us, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] net sched actions: implement get_fill_size routine in act_gact
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 01:45:30PM -0500, Roman Mashak wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Roman Mashak <mrv@...atatu.com>
>> ---
>> net/sched/act_gact.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/sched/act_gact.c b/net/sched/act_gact.c
>> index 7456325..ee775ac 100644
>> --- a/net/sched/act_gact.c
>> +++ b/net/sched/act_gact.c
>> @@ -217,6 +217,22 @@ static int tcf_gact_search(struct net *net, struct tc_action **a, u32 index,
>> return tcf_idr_search(tn, a, index);
>> }
>>
>> +static size_t tcf_gact_get_fill_size(const struct tc_action *act)
>> +{
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_GACT_PROB
>> + struct tcf_gact *gact = to_gact(act);
>> + int prob_len = 0;
>> +
>> + if (gact->tcfg_ptype)
>> + prob_len = nla_total_size(sizeof(struct tc_gact_p));
>> +#endif
>> + return nla_total_size(sizeof(struct tc_gact)) /* TCA_GACT_PARMS */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_GACT_PROB
>> + + prob_len /* TCA_GACT_PROB */
>> +#endif
>> + ;
>> +}
>
> This is quite bad to the eye. What about:
>
> static size_t tcf_gact_get_fill_size(const struct tc_action *act)
> {
> size_t sz = nla_total_size(sizeof(struct tc_gact)); /* TCA_GACT_PARMS */
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_GACT_PROB
> if (to_gact(act)->tcfg_ptype)
> sz += nla_total_size(sizeof(struct tc_gact_p)); /* TCA_GACT_PROB */
> #endif
>
> return sz;
> }
>
> Should be the same, bug easier to read.
Agree, I will send v2.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists