[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180301.212635.783607434433134528.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2018 21:26:35 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mmanning@...tta.mail-att.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, dsahern@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: allow interface to be set into VRF if VLAN
interface in same VRF
From: Mike Manning <mmanning@...tta.mail-att.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 23:49:30 +0000
> Setting an interface into a VRF fails with 'RTNETLINK answers: File
> exists' if one of its VLAN interfaces is already in the same VRF.
> As the VRF is an upper device of the VLAN interface, it is also showing
> up as an upper device of the interface itself. The solution is to
> restrict this check to devices other than master. As only one master
> device can be linked to a device, the check in this case is that the
> upper device (VRF) being linked to is not the same as the master device
> instead of it not being any one of the upper devices.
>
> The following example shows an interface ens12 (with a VLAN interface
> ens12.10) being set into VRF green, which behaves as expected:
>
> # ip link add link ens12 ens12.10 type vlan id 10
> # ip link set dev ens12 master vrfgreen
> # ip link show dev ens12
> 3: ens12: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel
> master vrfgreen state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
> link/ether 52:54:00:4c:a0:45 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>
> But if the VLAN interface has previously been set into the same VRF,
> then setting the interface into the VRF fails:
>
> # ip link set dev ens12 nomaster
> # ip link set dev ens12.10 master vrfgreen
> # ip link show dev ens12.10
> 39: ens12.10@...12: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500
> qdisc noqueue master vrfgreen state UP mode DEFAULT group default
> qlen 1000 link/ether 52:54:00:4c:a0:45 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> # ip link set dev ens12 master vrfgreen
> RTNETLINK answers: File exists
>
> The workaround is to move the VLAN interface back into the default VRF
> beforehand, but it has to be shut first so as to avoid the risk of
> traffic leaking from the VRF. This fix avoids needing this workaround.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Manning <mmanning@....com>
Applied, thanks Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists