[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <3eef25d5e0b41aa3429ba31f87264c17e75de9e6.1520500821.git.pabeni@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:29:30 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>,
Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] ipvlan: properly annotate rx_handler access
The rx_handler field is rcu-protected, but I forgot to use the
proper accessor while refactoring netif_is_ipvlan_port(). Such
function only check the rx_handler value, so it is safe, but we need
to properly read rx_handler via rcu_access_pointer() to avoid sparse
warnings.
Fixes: 1ec54cb44e67 ("net: unpollute priv_flags space")
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
---
drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan.h b/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan.h
index c818b9bdab6e..adb826f55e60 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan.h
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ int ipvlan_link_register(struct rtnl_link_ops *ops);
static inline bool netif_is_ipvlan_port(const struct net_device *dev)
{
- return dev->rx_handler == ipvlan_handle_frame;
+ return rcu_access_pointer(dev->rx_handler) == ipvlan_handle_frame;
}
#endif /* __IPVLAN_H */
--
2.14.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists