[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180308233758.3a374b66@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 23:38:12 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/7] tools: bpftool: silence 'missing
initializer' warnings
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018 23:00:35 +0100, Jiri Benc wrote:
> When building bpf tool, gcc emits piles of warnings:
>
> prog.c: In function ‘prog_fd_by_tag’:
> prog.c:101:9: warning: missing initializer for field ‘type’ of ‘struct bpf_prog_info’ [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
> struct bpf_prog_info info = {};
> ^
> In file included from /home/storage/jbenc/git/net-next/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h:26:0,
> from prog.c:47:
> /home/storage/jbenc/git/net-next/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h:925:8: note: ‘type’ declared here
> __u32 type;
> ^
>
> As these warnings are not useful, switch them off.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
FWIW I couldn't reproduce this one. Out of curiosity what GCC did you
use?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists