| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1520657170-398-2-git-send-email-michael.chan@broadcom.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 23:46:03 -0500
From: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net 1/8] bnxt_en: Refactor the functions to reserve hardware rings.
The bnxt_hwrm_reserve_{pf|vf}_rings() functions are very similar to
the bnxt_hwrm_check_{pf|vf}_rings() functions. Refactor the former
so that the latter can make use of common code in the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
index 1500243..377fceb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
@@ -4558,18 +4558,17 @@ int __bnxt_hwrm_get_tx_rings(struct bnxt *bp, u16 fid, int *tx_rings)
return rc;
}
-static int
-bnxt_hwrm_reserve_pf_rings(struct bnxt *bp, int tx_rings, int rx_rings,
- int ring_grps, int cp_rings, int vnics)
+static void
+__bnxt_hwrm_reserve_pf_rings(struct bnxt *bp, struct hwrm_func_cfg_input *req,
+ int tx_rings, int rx_rings, int ring_grps,
+ int cp_rings, int vnics)
{
- struct hwrm_func_cfg_input req = {0};
u32 enables = 0;
- int rc;
- bnxt_hwrm_cmd_hdr_init(bp, &req, HWRM_FUNC_CFG, -1, -1);
- req.fid = cpu_to_le16(0xffff);
+ bnxt_hwrm_cmd_hdr_init(bp, req, HWRM_FUNC_CFG, -1, -1);
+ req->fid = cpu_to_le16(0xffff);
enables |= tx_rings ? FUNC_CFG_REQ_ENABLES_NUM_TX_RINGS : 0;
- req.num_tx_rings = cpu_to_le16(tx_rings);
+ req->num_tx_rings = cpu_to_le16(tx_rings);
if (bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_NEW_RM) {
enables |= rx_rings ? FUNC_CFG_REQ_ENABLES_NUM_RX_RINGS : 0;
enables |= cp_rings ? FUNC_CFG_REQ_ENABLES_NUM_CMPL_RINGS |
@@ -4578,16 +4577,53 @@ int __bnxt_hwrm_get_tx_rings(struct bnxt *bp, u16 fid, int *tx_rings)
FUNC_CFG_REQ_ENABLES_NUM_HW_RING_GRPS : 0;
enables |= vnics ? FUNC_VF_CFG_REQ_ENABLES_NUM_VNICS : 0;
- req.num_rx_rings = cpu_to_le16(rx_rings);
- req.num_hw_ring_grps = cpu_to_le16(ring_grps);
- req.num_cmpl_rings = cpu_to_le16(cp_rings);
- req.num_stat_ctxs = req.num_cmpl_rings;
- req.num_vnics = cpu_to_le16(vnics);
+ req->num_rx_rings = cpu_to_le16(rx_rings);
+ req->num_hw_ring_grps = cpu_to_le16(ring_grps);
+ req->num_cmpl_rings = cpu_to_le16(cp_rings);
+ req->num_stat_ctxs = req->num_cmpl_rings;
+ req->num_vnics = cpu_to_le16(vnics);
}
- if (!enables)
+ req->enables = cpu_to_le32(enables);
+}
+
+static void
+__bnxt_hwrm_reserve_vf_rings(struct bnxt *bp,
+ struct hwrm_func_vf_cfg_input *req, int tx_rings,
+ int rx_rings, int ring_grps, int cp_rings,
+ int vnics)
+{
+ u32 enables = 0;
+
+ bnxt_hwrm_cmd_hdr_init(bp, req, HWRM_FUNC_VF_CFG, -1, -1);
+ enables |= tx_rings ? FUNC_VF_CFG_REQ_ENABLES_NUM_TX_RINGS : 0;
+ enables |= rx_rings ? FUNC_VF_CFG_REQ_ENABLES_NUM_RX_RINGS : 0;
+ enables |= cp_rings ? FUNC_VF_CFG_REQ_ENABLES_NUM_CMPL_RINGS |
+ FUNC_VF_CFG_REQ_ENABLES_NUM_STAT_CTXS : 0;
+ enables |= ring_grps ? FUNC_VF_CFG_REQ_ENABLES_NUM_HW_RING_GRPS : 0;
+ enables |= vnics ? FUNC_VF_CFG_REQ_ENABLES_NUM_VNICS : 0;
+
+ req->num_tx_rings = cpu_to_le16(tx_rings);
+ req->num_rx_rings = cpu_to_le16(rx_rings);
+ req->num_hw_ring_grps = cpu_to_le16(ring_grps);
+ req->num_cmpl_rings = cpu_to_le16(cp_rings);
+ req->num_stat_ctxs = req->num_cmpl_rings;
+ req->num_vnics = cpu_to_le16(vnics);
+
+ req->enables = cpu_to_le32(enables);
+}
+
+static int
+bnxt_hwrm_reserve_pf_rings(struct bnxt *bp, int tx_rings, int rx_rings,
+ int ring_grps, int cp_rings, int vnics)
+{
+ struct hwrm_func_cfg_input req = {0};
+ int rc;
+
+ __bnxt_hwrm_reserve_pf_rings(bp, &req, tx_rings, rx_rings, ring_grps,
+ cp_rings, vnics);
+ if (!req.enables)
return 0;
- req.enables = cpu_to_le32(enables);
rc = hwrm_send_message(bp, &req, sizeof(req), HWRM_CMD_TIMEOUT);
if (rc)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -4604,7 +4640,6 @@ int __bnxt_hwrm_get_tx_rings(struct bnxt *bp, u16 fid, int *tx_rings)
int ring_grps, int cp_rings, int vnics)
{
struct hwrm_func_vf_cfg_input req = {0};
- u32 enables = 0;
int rc;
if (!(bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_NEW_RM)) {
@@ -4612,22 +4647,8 @@ int __bnxt_hwrm_get_tx_rings(struct bnxt *bp, u16 fid, int *tx_rings)
return 0;
}
- bnxt_hwrm_cmd_hdr_init(bp, &req, HWRM_FUNC_VF_CFG, -1, -1);
- enables |= tx_rings ? FUNC_VF_CFG_REQ_ENABLES_NUM_TX_RINGS : 0;
- enables |= rx_rings ? FUNC_VF_CFG_REQ_ENABLES_NUM_RX_RINGS : 0;
- enables |= cp_rings ? FUNC_VF_CFG_REQ_ENABLES_NUM_CMPL_RINGS |
- FUNC_VF_CFG_REQ_ENABLES_NUM_STAT_CTXS : 0;
- enables |= ring_grps ? FUNC_VF_CFG_REQ_ENABLES_NUM_HW_RING_GRPS : 0;
- enables |= vnics ? FUNC_VF_CFG_REQ_ENABLES_NUM_VNICS : 0;
-
- req.num_tx_rings = cpu_to_le16(tx_rings);
- req.num_rx_rings = cpu_to_le16(rx_rings);
- req.num_hw_ring_grps = cpu_to_le16(ring_grps);
- req.num_cmpl_rings = cpu_to_le16(cp_rings);
- req.num_stat_ctxs = req.num_cmpl_rings;
- req.num_vnics = cpu_to_le16(vnics);
-
- req.enables = cpu_to_le32(enables);
+ __bnxt_hwrm_reserve_vf_rings(bp, &req, tx_rings, rx_rings, ring_grps,
+ cp_rings, vnics);
rc = hwrm_send_message(bp, &req, sizeof(req), HWRM_CMD_TIMEOUT);
if (rc)
return -ENOMEM;
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists