lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 10 Mar 2018 08:32:34 -0800
From:   Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:     Igor Mitsyanko <igor.mitsyanko.os@...ntenna.com>
Cc:     bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        sergey.matyukevich.os@...ntenna.com, smaksimenko@...ntenna.com,
        ashevchenko@...ntenna.com, dlebed@...ntenna.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
        ivecera@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] bridge: initialize port flags with
 switchdev defaults

On Fri,  9 Mar 2018 19:03:04 -0800
Igor Mitsyanko <igor.mitsyanko.os@...ntenna.com> wrote:

> Default bridge port flags for switchdev devices can be different from
> what is used in bridging core. Get default value from switchdev itself
> on port initialization.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Igor Mitsyanko <igor.mitsyanko.os@...ntenna.com>
> ---

Yes hardware devices may come it with different default values.
But the user experience on Linux needs to be consistent.

Instead, it makes more sense to me for each device driver using switchdev
to program to the values that it sees in the bridge.

Please revise this.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ