[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180314.140354.467457221253867994.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:03:54 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: tlfalcon@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, jallen@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
nfont@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] ibmvnic: Update TX pool and TX routines
From: Thomas Falcon <tlfalcon@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 19:34:17 -0500
> This patch restructures the TX pool data structure and provides a
> separate TX pool array for TSO transmissions. This is already used
> in some way due to our unique DMA situation, namely that we cannot
> use single DMA mappings for packet data. Previously, both buffer
> arrays used the same pool entry. This restructuring allows for
> some additional cleanup in the driver code, especially in some
> places in the device transmit routine.
>
> In addition, it allows us to more easily track the consumer
> and producer indexes of a particular pool. This has been
> further improved by better tracking of in-use buffers to
> prevent possible data corruption in case an invalid buffer
> entry is used.
...
> ibmvnic: Update release RX pool routine
I think you need to fix up this Subject line to say TX instead
of RX.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists