[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1e418c3d-0a28-db6c-a5bb-0e167091d0d3@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:08:16 -0500
From: Thomas Falcon <tlfalcon@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, jallen@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
nfont@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] ibmvnic: Update TX pool and TX routines
On 03/14/2018 01:03 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Thomas Falcon <tlfalcon@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 19:34:17 -0500
>
>> This patch restructures the TX pool data structure and provides a
>> separate TX pool array for TSO transmissions. This is already used
>> in some way due to our unique DMA situation, namely that we cannot
>> use single DMA mappings for packet data. Previously, both buffer
>> arrays used the same pool entry. This restructuring allows for
>> some additional cleanup in the driver code, especially in some
>> places in the device transmit routine.
>>
>> In addition, it allows us to more easily track the consumer
>> and producer indexes of a particular pool. This has been
>> further improved by better tracking of in-use buffers to
>> prevent possible data corruption in case an invalid buffer
>> entry is used.
> ...
>> ibmvnic: Update release RX pool routine
> I think you need to fix up this Subject line to say TX instead
> of RX.
>
> Thanks.
>
Drat, I missed that. I'll send another version shortly. Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists