[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <639992a2-d651-8030-1a54-919e8e5827cf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 10:59:55 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, privat@...l-hjelmeland.no,
vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, davem@...emloft.net,
rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk, sean.wang@...iatek.com,
Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com, john@...ozen.org, cphealy@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] net: dsa: Plug in PHYLINK support
Hi Andrew,
On 03/18/2018 12:19 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> +static int dsa_slave_nway_reset(struct net_device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_slave_to_port(dev);
>> +
>> + return phylink_ethtool_nway_reset(dp->pl);
>> +}
>
> Hi Florian
>
> I've seen in one of Russells trees a patch to put a phylink into
> net_device. That would make a generic slave_nway_reset() possible, and
> a few others as well. Maybe it makes sense to pull in that patch?
To make this generic, we would have to have net_device carry a reference
to a phylink instance, which I would rather not do. Were you possibly
referring to this patch set:
http://git.armlinux.org.uk/cgit/linux-arm.git/commit/?h=phy&id=4eda3b76573473d811bc80a6f0e5a2e06dd76bf6
in which case I think it was discussed and rejected (that was my
recollection).
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists