netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] wcn36xx: Disable 5GHz for wcn3610

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMZdPi8mS92ACrZOmfnni7bnCKkU5x-Z26QKcu_-J9xYuCjq1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 29 Mar 2018 09:40:33 +0200
From:   Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>
To:     Ramon Fried <rfried@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>, wcn36xx@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] wcn36xx: Disable 5GHz for wcn3610

Hi Ramon,

On 29 March 2018 at 09:32, Ramon Fried <rfried@...eaurora.org> wrote:

>> Should we document qcom,wcn3610 just like wcn3620 is:
>>
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,wcnss-pil.txt:                    "qcom,wcn3620",
> IMHO the mentioned bindings is related to the PIL (peripheral image loaded) which is just the firmware part and has
> nothing to do with wifi frontend(IRIS).
>

It seems that the RF is a subnode of the PIL node:

"= SUBNODES
A required subnode of the WCNSS PIL is used to describe the attached rf module
and its resource dependencies. It is described by the following properties:"

So we should add qcom,wcn3610 to the exiting list of 'compatible' rf modules.

Regards,
Loic