[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180405114027.500aefad@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 11:40:27 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
Tal Gilboa <talgi@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the pci tree
Hi all,
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 13:14:54 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 2907938d2375 ("net/mlx5e: Use pcie_bandwidth_available() to compute bandwidth")
>
> from the pci tree and commit:
>
> 0608d4dbaf4e ("net/mlx5e: Unify slow PCI heuristic")
>
> from the net-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
> index 884337f88589,0aab3afc6885..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
> @@@ -3880,16 -4026,50 +4033,20 @@@ void mlx5e_build_default_indir_rqt(u32
> indirection_rqt[i] = i % num_channels;
> }
>
> - static bool cqe_compress_heuristic(u32 link_speed, u32 pci_bw)
> -static int mlx5e_get_pci_bw(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev, u32 *pci_bw)
> -{
> - enum pcie_link_width width;
> - enum pci_bus_speed speed;
> - int err = 0;
> -
> - err = pcie_get_minimum_link(mdev->pdev, &speed, &width);
> - if (err)
> - return err;
> -
> - if (speed == PCI_SPEED_UNKNOWN || width == PCIE_LNK_WIDTH_UNKNOWN)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - switch (speed) {
> - case PCIE_SPEED_2_5GT:
> - *pci_bw = 2500 * width;
> - break;
> - case PCIE_SPEED_5_0GT:
> - *pci_bw = 5000 * width;
> - break;
> - case PCIE_SPEED_8_0GT:
> - *pci_bw = 8000 * width;
> - break;
> - default:
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> + static bool slow_pci_heuristic(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev)
> {
> - return (link_speed && pci_bw &&
> - (pci_bw < 40000) && (pci_bw < link_speed));
> - }
> + u32 link_speed = 0;
> + u32 pci_bw = 0;
>
> - static bool hw_lro_heuristic(u32 link_speed, u32 pci_bw)
> - {
> - return !(link_speed && pci_bw &&
> - (pci_bw <= 16000) && (pci_bw < link_speed));
> + mlx5e_get_max_linkspeed(mdev, &link_speed);
> - mlx5e_get_pci_bw(mdev, &pci_bw);
> ++ pci_bw = pcie_bandwidth_available(mdev->pdev, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> + mlx5_core_dbg_once(mdev, "Max link speed = %d, PCI BW = %d\n",
> + link_speed, pci_bw);
> +
> + #define MLX5E_SLOW_PCI_RATIO (2)
> +
> + return link_speed && pci_bw &&
> + link_speed > MLX5E_SLOW_PCI_RATIO * pci_bw;
> }
>
> void mlx5e_set_tx_cq_mode_params(struct mlx5e_params *params, u8 cq_period_mode)
This is now a conflict between the pci tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists