netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 00/11] udp gso

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180418.153318.51295736872496660.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Wed, 18 Apr 2018 15:33:18 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     alexander.duyck@...il.com
Cc:     sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com, willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com,
        sridhar.samudrala@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        willemb@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 00/11] udp gso

From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 11:12:06 -0700

> My only concern with the patch set is verifying what mitigations are
> in case so that we aren't trying to set an MSS size that results in a
> frame larger than MTU. I'm still digging through the code and trying
> to grok it, but I figured I might just put the question out there to
> may my reviewing easier.

It signals an error if a too large segment size is requested.