[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180419.134512.2236555560549522651.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 13:45:12 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, willemb@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 00/11] udp gso
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 14:12:40 -0400
> Actually, yes, I should be able to relax that constraint with
> segmentation.
>
> It is there in case a corked packet may grow to the point of
> having to be fragmented. But segmentation already ensures
> that its datagrams always fit in MTU.
>
> Should be simple refinement to
>
> !(flags & MSG_MORE) &&
>
> in __ip_append_data.
Right, if segmentation never sends greater than mtu then we can
relax the restriction in this way.
Great idea.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists